Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
04/13/2023 05:15 PM House EDUCATION
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB105 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE EDUCATION STANDING COMMITTEE
April 13, 2023
5:15 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Jamie Allard, Co-Chair
Representative Justin Ruffridge, Co-Chair
Representative Mike Prax
Representative CJ McCormick
Representative Tom McKay
Representative Rebecca Himschoot
Representative Andi Story
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
OTHER LEGISLATORS PRESENT
Representative Jennie Armstrong
Representative Alyse Galvin
Representative Andy Josephson
Representative Jesse Sumner
Representative Will Stapp
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 105
"An Act relating to parental rights in a child's education;
relating to access to school records; relating to sex education,
human reproduction education, and human sexuality education;
relating to school disciplinary and safety programs; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 105
SHORT TITLE: SEX/REPRODUCTION EDUCATION; SCHOOLS
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
03/08/23 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/08/23 (H) EDC, JUD
03/13/23 (H) EDC AT 8:00 AM DAVIS 106
03/13/23 (H) Heard & Held
03/13/23 (H) MINUTE(EDC)
03/29/23 (H) EDC AT 8:00 AM DAVIS 106
03/29/23 (H) Heard & Held
03/29/23 (H) MINUTE(EDC)
03/30/23 (H) EDC AT 5:15 PM DAVIS 106
03/30/23 (H) Heard & Held
03/30/23 (H) MINUTE(EDC)
04/13/23 (H) EDC AT 5:15 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
RON SOHERVILLE, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
JOHNNY ELLIOT, Representing Self
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
CORRINE MARKS, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
CHEYENNE CUELLAR, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
RACHEL IAFOUA, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ELIZABETH HILLSTROM, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
LILY AYAU, Representing Self
Skagway, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
CALLIE CONERTON, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JACQUELINE BACHER, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JOSIE POUG, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SHELBY JONES, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ELIZABETH SIDDON, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ANDY HOLLEMAN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KELBY RANDALL, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KELLY LESSENS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DYANI CHAPMAN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KAROLINA PAVIC, Representing Self
Girdwood, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
FRANCESCA ALLEGREZZA, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
DON ROBERTS JR, Representing Self
Kodiak, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JIMMY MORRISON, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
MICHAEL CONTI, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DAVID CARTER, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 105.
ALLEN STRAH, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KRISTIE WALL, Representing Self
Kodiak, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 105.
RACHEL LORD, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
LAURA STEELE, Representing Self
Auke Bay, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JACOB BERA, Representing Self
Peters Creek, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 105.
MYLES MCDONALD, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
HANNAH WATKINS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KATE VEH, Representing Self
Soldotna, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
TONJA MOSER, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KRISTIN GARUT, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
PATRICK O'CONNOR, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
WILLIAM LIART, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
CATHERINE POOL, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ALLISON RADFORD, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MAGGIE KNULL, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ALEXANDER MORIARTY, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ROB ROYS, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
GRIFFEN SUKKAEW, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
YVETTE SOUTIERE, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SARA FRANK, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
YOLANDA TANKERSLEY, Representing Self
Chugiak, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
NATILY BEALS, Representing Self
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
COURTNEY WEAVER, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JIMENA CUENCA, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ANNA BRAWLEY, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EMILY KEITHAHN, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JESSICA ULLRICH, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SIERRA MOSKIOS, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DOUG KOESTER, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ROBERT HOCKEMA, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JUDY ELEDGE, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 105.
EARL BANNING, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DENNIS MURRAY, Representing Self
Soldotna, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
REBECCA HINSBERGER, Representing Self
Kasilof, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
CHELSEA TREMBLAY, Representing Self
Petersburg, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SAMANTHA HODGINS, Representing Self
Petersburg, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EZZY BANNING, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
VICTORIA CURRAN, Representing Self
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
REBECCA BERNARD, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MICHELLE VASQUEZ, Representing Self
Soldotna, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MENEKA THIRU, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
STEVEN FARRING, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SHAWN GARDNER, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
THEA SCALISE, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ALANA BRANSON, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KALEB DAUGHERTY, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SEAN PHILLIPS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
OLIVIA EDWARDS, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
BRITTANY QUALES, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
STEPHEN EDWARDS, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ADAM HAYS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KATHLEEN RAYMOND, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KRISTINA VAN HOOGMOED, Representing Self
Kodiak, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DR. ROBIN HOLMES, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JESSICA ROZATO, Representing Self
Denali, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
NICHOLE BEARDEN, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
TODD WEHNES, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ELSTUN LAUESEN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KAIA BLOUNT, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DOMINIC SCALISE, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
BETH SHORT-RHOADS, Representing Self
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JESSICA GUANA, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ROBERT PATTERSON, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
GUS PAUL, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DAVID LESLIE, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
RAE RAMOS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EMILY COHEN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JOHN LETTOW, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
KELLY NASH, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
MARY SZATKOWSKI, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DAVID BOYLE, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
PAMELA HALL, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
ALEX PETKANAS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JO ANN GRUBER, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SAGE WHITMAN, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JAY HITCHCOCK, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DR. VALERIE BROOKS, Representing Self
Ketchikan, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EMILY HARTLEY, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ERIN HOLLINGSWORTH, Representing Self
Utqiagvik, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ELENA PRISSEKIN, Representing Self
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ANALISE GOEDEKE, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JULIE SCHMIDT, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MICHAEL FLINT, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
TAMARA KRUSE ROSELIUS, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
STACEY LANGE, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
LAUREN BESKOW, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
YVONNE UMNER, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
TITUS SOFRON, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 105.
KELLI REED, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ALICIA SIDEBOTTOM, Representing Self
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
CARLY JENSEN, Representing Self
Soldotna, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JOHN OSTERHOUT, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
VALINA HANSEN, Representing Self
Haines, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
DIANNE MACRAE, Representing Self
Kasilof, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
PRISCILLA HURLEY, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the hearing on HB 105.
KASSANDRA SMILEY, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
LIZ LYKE, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MAREN MILLER, Representing Self
Kodiak, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SARAH SULLIVAN, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SIQIINQ MAUPIN, Director
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Artic
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
RANDI IVERSON, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SHANE BRODIE, Representing Self
Nome, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SHARON HEIN, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SAMANTHA THOMAS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
AARON SPRATT, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
DENILE AULT, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MARK AAMODT, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
BRITTANY TOMKINS, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
AMY RODMAN, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
LISA BRICKER, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
DANIEL TWEEDY, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
CHANDRA COFFROY, Representing Self
Anchor Point, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
CLAUDIA HAINES, Representing Self
Homer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JACLYN GAGNON, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
GEORGE SNODGRASS, Representing Self
Eagle River, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
DANA THYNES, Representing Self
Petersburg, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
GAIL MCBRIDE, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
CHAVA SCHAPIRA, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
AMANDA SPRATT, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
WILL MULDOON, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ASA PENDERGRAST, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KEVIN BERRY, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JAMES SQUYRES, Representing Self
Deltana, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
MARGIE THOMSON, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
BILL SPENCER, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
IVAN HODES, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KACYA BATISHCHEVA, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
GUY HARRIS, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KATE JOHNSON, Representing Self
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JULEE-ANNA PREUIT, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EPHRAIM FROEHLICH, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
KATHY MILLER, Representing Self
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
LISA MALONEY, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
JOHN CREED, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MAE MARSH, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
SKYLAR EVANS, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
OLIVER BERGH, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
IRENE QUEDNOW, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
EARL WILLIANS JR., Representing Self
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SONAZ SAFARI, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
HANNAH WARREN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
REBECCA AMES, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
ALEX BARSEKIAN, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EMILY SULLIVAN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EMILY GEBEL, Representing Self
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during in support of HB 105.
ERICA WATSON, Representing Self
Denali Park, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SCOTT HANSEN, Representing Self
Haines, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
JAN DELAND, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
KRISTEN SCHUPP, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
EMMANUEL HANSEN, Representing Self
Haines, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
MICHALE RATZLAFF, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
SUMMER ANDERSEN, Representing Self
Haines, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
LOIS EPSTEIN, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
MEG WAITE, Representing Self
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 105.
IRIS WILLIAMS, Representing Self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
JASON ROBINSON, Representing Self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 105.
ACTION NARRATIVE
5:15:03 PM
CO-CHAIR JAMIE ALLARD called the House Education Standing
Committee meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. Representatives Story,
McKay, Himschoot, Prax, Ruffridge, and Allard were present at
the call to order. Representative McCormick arrived as the
meeting was in progress. Also present were Representatives
Armstrong, Galvin, Josephson, Sumner, and Stapp.
HB 105-SEX/REPRODUCTION EDUCATION; SCHOOLS
5:15:49 PM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD announced that the only order of business would
be public testimony on HOUSE BILL NO. 105, "An Act relating to
parental rights in a child's education; relating to access to
school records; relating to sex education, human reproduction
education, and human sexuality education; relating to school
disciplinary and safety programs; and providing for an effective
date."
5:16:05 PM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD began by acknowledging misperceptions regarding
the proposed legislation, adding that she wished to briefly
clarify some points. She stated that nothing in the bill would
require a teacher to "out" a lesbian, gay, or bisexual student
to their parents. It neither states this in the bill, nor does
the legislature want it to, she said. She opined that educators
should not be involved in the sex lives of students. She listed
the following requirements in the bill: parental permission for
addressing a child by a different name; parental permission
regarding sexual and gender related content at school to which
the child would be exposed; and the use of bathrooms and locker
rooms, if labeled, to coincide with a student's biological sex.
Further, HB 105 would make it illegal for a school district to
withhold information from parents regarding a child's physical,
medical, or mental health.
5:18:41 PM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD opened public testimony on HB 105.
5:19:24 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 5:19 p.m. to 5:20 p.m.
5:20:36 PM
RON SOHERVILLE, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He said he was not gay but had no issue with those who
"choose to take that lifestyle." He opined that parents should
be involved in their children's schooling, including any
discussions related to gender identity. He said if the school
system did not recognize parents' involvement, he would support
parents taking their children out of public schools and
enrolling them in charter schools.
5:23:37 PM
JOHNNY ELLIOT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He shared his pronouns as he/him. He said that while he
supported parental involvement in the school system, HB 105
seemed focused on parental control and consent of "every nitty
gritty" related to students' education; for example, how a child
presents at school and what names they choose. He stated that a
teacher's support of a transgender ("trans") student
dramatically drops the likelihood that the student will attempt
suicide, adding that the proposed legislation would not allow
teachers to be that person.
5:25:59 PM
CORRINE MARKS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She related that she was a teacher, a parent to a trans
man, and a sister to gay man. She likened to bill's focus to
the McCarty Era and identified the ally/educator as "the next
witch or communist." She emphasized her thankfulness for the
allies and teachers that both her brother and son had.
5:28:30 PM
CHEYENNE CUELLAR, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She shared that she was an educator who taught a
reproductive unit in science. She shared that under current
law, she was required to send a note to parents giving them the
chance to opt out their child from the unit. Under HB 105,
she would have to collect permission slips, which would be a
further burden and could result in students missing the unit as
a result of permission slips not being submitted.
5:29:49 PM
RACHEL IAFOUA, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that she would not pretend that the bill was
about giving parents a choice, opining that it would send the
message that trans kids do not belong. She believed that
passage of the bill could hinder a student's ability to be
successful in such an environment.
5:31:29 PM
ELIZABETH HILLSTROM, Representing Self, testified in opposition
to HB 105. She stated that many times parents are slow to
accept children's identities and may not agree or understand
what children are going through. She opined that teachers
should be allowed the freedom to provide an education without
feeling that they are "walking on eggshells" for opening
themselves up to lawsuits.
5:33:06 PM
LILY AYAU, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105.
She offered her belief that youth deserve the opportunity to
learn about gender identity and expression, and the opportunity
to disclose information about their gender at their discretion
to the people of their choosing.
5:33:43 PM
CALLIE CONERTON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stated that in her classroom, diversity was
respected, and she supported the differences she saw in the
world. She opined that the proposed legislation would limit the
empathy that she can show and discuss in her classroom.
5:35:20 PM
JACQUELINE BACHER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stated that as a teacher, teaching is never the
only thing that you do. The role of a teacher is one that is
complicated, but being a safe and trusted individual for a
student who does not have that at home is one of the most
important duties, she said. She questioned how Alaska could be
enriched with such a law [as HB 105].
5:38:15 PM
JOSIE POUG, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she was very nervous about public speaking,
opining that the bill was "really terrible and not right." She
said she went to counseling at her school and felt comfortable
talking to the counselor, adding that some people tell their
counselor things they would not tell their parents.
5:39:22 PM
SHELBY JONES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that she disagreed with the bill because "you
are you and that's who you are."
5:40:31 PM
ELIZABETH SIDDON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She referenced a radio advertisement from 20 years ago
that stuck with her, which asked kids whether they had five
trusted adults in their lives. She said she knows that teachers
are the trusted adults for kids in the community. She asked the
committee to remember that kids are dealing with a lot and need
support.
5:42:42 PM
ANDY HOLLEMAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He believed that some parts of the bill were good, and
some were problematic. He stated that permission slips and
lesson plans are part of school, but a clerical error could lead
to a civil lawsuit. He asked the committee to not make it worse
by passing HB 105.
5:44:06 PM
KELBY RANDALL, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He shared that he is a transgender citizen. He recalled
when he was in high school and sought the help of one of his
teachers. Had the bill been in effect, he said, the teacher
would have been liable to tell his parents and there would have
been negative repercussions.
5:46:50 PM
KELLY LESSENS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that bill would not do anything to help support
her children's education.
5:49:10 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
5:50:18 PM
DYANI CHAPMAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She highlighted a section on page 2 of the bill regarding
teachers having to spend more time following up on permission
slips instead of actually teaching. She opined that extra
bureaucracy served no one well, adding that the bill had "gray
areas."
5:52:32 PM
KAROLINA PAVIC, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated how "absolutely embarrassing" the bill was for
the legislative body, observing how another hearing was now
taking place on the subject of legislating gender. She
referenced the number of teachers already abandoning the trade.
She expressed concern about being required to contact parents
each time a student went by a pronoun or a name, in addition to
all of the other duties teachers have.
5:55:04 PM
FRANCESCA ALLEGREZZA, Representing Self, testified in support of
HB 105. She characterized schools that hide and keep secrets
from parents as alarming and disturbing. If teachers do not
respect the rights and beliefs of parents, they should be held
responsible, she opined. She shared her belief that parental
consent for a sexual education topic was a must and should not
be taught before fourth grade.
5:57:43 PM
DON ROBERTS JR., Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He stated that he served as a volunteer crossing guard
for 20 years and took the well-being of children very seriously.
He added that the bill would open the door to harassment and
bullying because it prevented employees from intervening.
6:00:19 PM
JIMMY MORRISON, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He expressed support for the bill's intent to maintain
public transparency and guarantee parents' rights in public
schools. He argued that no teacher should try to blur the role
between a parent and teacher. Educators should teach
established curriculum, not indoctrination, ideology, or become
intimately involved with parents' children, he said.
6:02:50 PM
MICHAEL CONTI, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He shared that he was a parent of a trans child. Given
the difficulties of growing up, the bill may further marginalize
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and
asexual (LGBTQIA) kids by taking away their privacy and support
networks, he opined.
6:04:44 PM
DAVID CARTER, Representing Self, testified during the hearing on
HB 105. He stated that he was retired, heterosexual, and a big
supporter of public education. He mentioned a book called "The
Founding Myth" published in 2019 by Andrew Seidel, opining that
it could be a wonderful source of information for legislators,
staff members, media, parents and teachers.
6:07:05 PM
ALLEN STRAH, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He said the failure to educate kids on reproductive health
could eventually result in unwanted teenage pregnancy and the
spread of sexually transmitted infections. He suggested that if
parents want involvement in their children's education, they can
(indisc.) and attend parent-teacher association (PTA) meetings.
Educators, he said, should not be told how to do their job,
arguing that kids could be "outed" against their will [should HB
105 pass].
6:09:29 PM
KRISTIE WALL, Representing Self, testified during the hearing on
HB 105. She stated that she was passionate about education and
shared that she was a grandmother to two young girls that she
hoped could build relationships with their teachers when the
time comes. Educators are not creating the problem, she said,
but must deal with the problems the children bring to them in
the best way they can. She opined that HB 105 would be a
problem for teachers.
6:12:07 PM
RACHEL LORD, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared that she was a parent to two children in two
different schools and was a member of both schools' PTA.
Parents have rights, but so do children, she said. The bill
could actively increase tension between families and schools and
violate the rights of Alaska's youth.
6:13:44 PM
LAURA STEELE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that she was a mother of a two-year old and had
many concerns about raising a child; however, when her child
starts school, she said she was not concerned about her child
using the same bathroom of a transgender student, or teachers
using a child's preferred name, or teachers offering age-
appropriate sex education and talking with her child about
gender identity or sexual orientation.
6:15:30 PM
JACOB BERA, Representing Self, testified during the hearing on
HB 105. He shared that he was a teacher and parent but wished
to speak from a parent's perspective. He said he had many
opportunities to come to school to talk with teachers and
principals. In terms of the intent of the bill to ensure that
parents have access to schools, he said that had not been his
experience, nor a problem. As a teacher, his interest was in
how to make schools a place where everyone feels welcome. He
suggested that the committee look at guidelines that the
Anchorage School District (ASD) has put out regarding this
subject matter, which he believed to be more appropriate than HB
105.
6:17:35 PM
MYLES MCDONALD, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He said if the bill had been in place when he was a
student, it could have been "too much to handle."
6:18:50 PM
HANNAH WATKINS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. As a former student, a peer educator, and a future medical
professional, she stated that HB 105 would harm many children
and serve to endanger vulnerable children by forcibly outing
them to parents who were not supportive of their identity.
6:20:59 PM
KATE VEH, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105
because the bill would force teachers and counselors to "out"
students who are gay or trans to their parents. Additionally,
she pointed out that there was a teacher shortage. She believed
that added responsibilities on their to-do list would not be
beneficial.
6:23:01 PM
TONJA MOSER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105 as a retired teacher. She said she came before the
committee with two messages: firstly, to trust teachers because
they love their job and take it seriously; secondly, as a parent
of a trans kid, she explained that her child went to a teacher
first before coming to her. She opined that the bill would hurt
children that do not have accepting parents.
6:25:24 PM
KRISTIN GARUT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105 as a 25-year educator in Alaska. She said there were many
aspects of the proposed legislation that were of great concern
to her. She expressed concern about the provision requiring
written permission from a parent before a name or pronoun is
used by a school to address a student, in addition to the
requirement for students to use a bathroom corresponding with
their biological sex. It would only further marginalize and
stigmatize the students, she opined.
6:27:47 PM
PATRICK O'CONNOR, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He believed that the bill was not written with the
well-being of students in mind and disregarded the consequences
of family isolation experienced by many queer youths. If a
student does not have supportive parents, they may turn to a
trusted adult, such as an educator, he said, opining that HB 105
supported radical political objectives.
6:29:56 PM
WILLIAM LIART, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105, and shared that he was a parent of a trans child. He
shared his belief that it should not be illegal for adults, such
as educators, to help their students who may be struggling.
6:32:00 PM
CATHERINE POOL, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she was disheartened by what educators and kids
face during their "navigation of this world," adding that she
strongly opposed the proposed legislation.
6:32:46 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 6:32 p.m. to 6:34 p.m.
6:34:52 PM
ALLISON RADFORD, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said she did not prepare any remarks but wanted to
acknowledge the bravery of others who had testified in
opposition to the bill.
6:35:23 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 6:35 p.m.
6:36:07 PM
MAGGIE KNULL, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that her legal name was Margaret, not Maggie,
which she defined as her "gender conforming nickname. Under
the proposed legislation, she would have had to get permission
from her parents to use that nickname. She said she knew she
was a safe and trusted adult, adding that students were not
always ready to talk to a parent about their lives. As a
teacher, it was her legal obligation to keep kids safe, she
said.
6:38:38 PM
ALEXANDER MORIARTY, Representing Self, testified in opposition
to HB 105. He wished to "piggyback" on other testifiers tonight
regarding finding a trusted adult. He recounted how he came out
to a pastor and how important it was for him to be able to do
that. He said he did not want others to have the experience of
living with family members who are not supportive, but its the
only choice they have.
6:40:54 PM
ROB ROYS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105.
He opined that the bill would increase teen suicide, teen
pregnancy, and sexual assault.
6:41:57 PM
GRIFFEN SUKKAEW, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He stated that he works in the [capitol] building and
that he is a transgender man. He said he hoped to become a
teacher after college graduation, but he questioned working in a
state that is actively working against the future. Transgender
people have always been around, he said, adding that the bill
would just make a transgender kid's life so much worse.
6:43:05 PM
YVETTE SOUTIERE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. Being from Colorado originally, she protested
Colorado's Amendment 2, opining that HB 105 was another step
closer to Alaska having something similar; however, Amendment 2
was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, she noted. She said
for some children, school is the only place they feel safe, and
expressed her belief that the bill falsely claimed to be about
parental rights. She asked, What about the children?
6:45:31 PM
SARA FRANK, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared that her father was a trans man, and emphasized
that children are their own unique individuals, not the property
of their parents. An adult's job is to help children process
and understand their experiences, not control them, she said.
6:47:58 PM
YOLANDA TANKERSLEY, Representing Self, testified in opposition
to HB 105, as a parent of a transgender son whom she was
testifying on behalf of. She relayed contents of a letter
written from her son, named Jessie, summarizing that he was
comfortable being who he is today because of his teachers
helping him understand that people can be different. If the
bill passes, he wrote, children like him won't have that chance.
He said he would hate to see Alaska become as backwards as so
many other states.
6:50:07 PM
NATILY BEALS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that the bill claimed to be around parental
rights; however, it threatened to strip away the rights of
minors who are also U.S. citizens. She mentioned the case of
Tinker v. Des Moines [Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community
School District (1969)], and likened gender presentation as any
other form of expression, adding that trans youth also deserve
the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
6:52:15 PM
COURTNEY WEAVER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He questioned the bill's intent, as an educator
teaching in Alaska's public schools, opining that it would do
little to address parental rights. She urged the legislative
body to oppose the bill.
6:54:02 PM
JIMENA CUENCA, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared her belief that HB 105 targeted kids and
exposed them to bullying just because of who they are, which is
not the Alaska she knows and loves, she said. She stated the
bill was wrong and uncaring, and that schools should be able to
protect children from mistreatment without the threat of a
lawsuit.
6:56:23 PM
ANNA BRAWLEY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said he wanted to speak to several points, one being
the framing of the bill as supporting parents' rights. She
emphasized the need to support children's rights. She quoted
portions of the Alaska Constitution, summarizing that all
persons are equal and entitled to equal rights, opportunities,
and protection under the law. She believed that the bill was
"an unconstitutional waste of time."
6:58:32 PM
EMILY KEITHAHN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared that she worked for the Juneau School District
and that her passion was engaging in youth suicide prevention.
One of the known risk factors of youth suicide is
discrimination, she said, opining that the passage of the bill
could directly contribute to suicide risk factors. She urged
the committee to oppose HB 105.
6:59:49 PM
JESSICA ULLRICH, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said she had two teenage daughters, naming her 15-
year-old as the cause of opposition to HB 105. She
characterized the bill as disregarding children's rights;
discriminatory towards trans children; and unnecessary. The
bill claimed to focus on parental rights but lacked children's
rights. She added that she did not understand why a permission
slip was "added to the mix," nor did she understand how gender
specific bathrooms and locker rooms would be safer. She opined
that the bill was short-sighted and unnecessary.
7:02:10 PM
SIERRA MOSKIOS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she recognized that many people preceding her had
"eloquently stated what she wanted to say."
7:02:49 PM
DOUG KOESTER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He said he was a sex educator for five years in Alaska and
wanted to stress his strong opposition to HB 105, as well as how
difficult it could make things for educators. He emphasized the
importance of teaching body autonomy to younger kids and
protection from sexual abuse.
7:05:22 PM
ROBERT HOCKEMA, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He referred to Co-Chair Allard's opening statement that
the bill wouldnt out students, and that parents have a right
to know what is going on in their kids' lives. He contended
that those rights should never conflict with a child's right to
a safe education. If the bill passed, he said he was afraid
that children would be "outed," adding that he did not agree
with gender specific locker rooms and bathrooms.
7:07:53 PM
JUDY ELEDGE, Representing Self, testified during the hearing on
HB 105. She expressed concern regarding the definition of
parental rights, adding that she was shocked that parental
rights needed to be identified in education. She said nowhere
in HB 105, which she defined as a "parental rights bill," was
there an effort to endanger children by notifying parents of
something as serious as gender confusion.
7:10:26 PM
EARL BANNING, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105 as a psychologist and parent of a trans child. He believed
that there were many things wrong with the bill and would not
have time to speak to all of them. If the bill passed, trans
students would not be given the same rights at school. He
pointed out that trans students may not have support at home and
that teachers can save the lives of children by allowing them to
feel accepted. He opined that the state government was trying
to legislate nicknames and gender identity, adding that the bill
would not help or protect anyone, including teachers.
7:13:00 PM
DENNIS MURRAY, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. As a parent of several children, he stated, parents are
their first teachers. He found it unfortunate that the proposed
legislation needed to be before the public, opining that the
notion of parental responsibility was diminished when
representatives of the state - being teachers - believe that
they have more rights than the parents. He urged the committee
to pass the legislation and affirm that parents are the
foundation that needs to be protected.
7:14:38 PM
REBECCA HINSBERGER, Representing Self, testified in support of
HB 105. She expressed her belief that she represented the
majority of parents, opining that with the rare exception of
dysfunctional or abusive parents, most parents are safe and
loving. She believed that children's mental health had suffered
from the removal of that safety. She said teens are in the most
vulnerable period of their lives and need their parents love
and involvement. They should never be separated from that by
the government or school, she added. She opined that the bill
supported gender confusion.
7:17:04 PM
CHELSEA TREMBLAY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She focused on what it was like to be young in Alaska's
schools as a person dealing with hostility regarding gender or
sexual orientation. She said now that talking about it had
become more acceptable, the bill would make things even harder
and more challenging.
7:18:41 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
7:20:03 PM
SAMANTHA HODGINS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said she served as a primary care provider for
adolescents and young adults, many of whom were "gender
diverse." She said the law outlined in HB 105 would have a
monumentally negative impact on youth. She urged the committee
to reconsider enacting HB 105 to further prevent alienation and
potential harm to an already disenfranchised minority
population.
7:21:37 PM
EZZY BANNING, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared that she was an 11-year-old student who had
gone to school in four different states, noting that each time
she was taught to be kind and celebrate differences. She
believed that the bill was focused on the wrong things, and that
no one is worried about what bathroom they use. She opined that
the rights of transgender kids should not be taken away. She
asked the committee to create safe spaces for everyone in school
instead of "creating a problem when there isn't one."
7:23:42 PM
VICTORIA CURRAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said parents already have full control to opt their
child out of any activity or class they do not support;
additionally, there are bathrooms that can be used if someone is
uncomfortable. She believed that by not allowing students to
live their authentic selves at school, which is the only safe
space for some, it could increase the likelihood of self-harm
and suicide for transgender, as well as other youth. She urged
the committee not to pass HB 105, as it would burden teachers,
administrators, increase the cost of education, and hurt all
students.
7:25:37 PM
REBECCA BERNARD, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said she was the mother of two children, one of
whom is transgender. She shared that her daughter had the
familys support because they see how happy she is. She said HB
105 is a harmful bill that has no place in "freedom loving"
Alaska; further, that many unsupported youths would not be able
to get the required permission to use chosen names and pronouns
and would have to spend their school days being something they
are not.
7:27:54 PM
MICHELLE VASQUEZ, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stated that the bill was a threat to the safety and
well-being of queer youth in public schools. She implored the
committee to reject HB 105.
7:28:34 PM
MENEKA THIRU, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that the bill would create an unsafe
environment for trans and nonbinary students, adding that it was
a violation of a student's right to privacy and safety.
7:29:36 PM
STEVEN FARRING, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He stated that the bill was completely unnecessary, and
that it targeted children for political gain.
7:30:18 PM
SHAWN GARDNER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She referenced kids who did not have a supportive family
environment and offered a personal anecdote of a gay friend who
had been kicked out of his home in high school.
7:32:12 PM
THEA SCALISE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that if the bill passed, it would add a barrier
to comprehensive, age-appropriate sex education programs, which
play a crucial role in keeping children safe. All children
deserve to feel safe and protected in school, she said.
7:33:45 PM
ALANA BRANSON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she was a healthcare provider, and that she and
her younger sibling are transgender. She said the bill touched
her professional and personal passions, as well as her
expertise, and would "out" students who are transgender to their
parents. Even trans kids with safe and accepting parents at
home should be allowed the autonomy to have conversations about
their identity in their own time, she opined.
7:36:21 PM
KALEB DAUGHERTY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He stated that trans youth should feel safe and
respected just like everyone else in their communities. The
intentions of the bill were bad, he said, opining that the
outcomes would be bad.
7:37:39 PM
SEAN PHILLIPS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He expressed concern that the bill would lead to suicides
and pointed out that Alaska ranked second in the nation for
suicides already. Additionally, he noted that Alaska was ranked
first in sexual violence.
7:39:22 PM
OLIVIA EDWARDS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that the bill would harm already vulnerable
LGBTQIA youths by forcibly "outing" them to their parents and
infringing on basic privacy.
7:40:11 PM
BRITTANY QUALES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105 because the bill was prejudicial. She believed that the
kids would lose regardless of what side of the bill one was on.
7:42:04 PM
STEPHEN EDWARDS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105 as a citizen of Alaska who cared about the way the
government was run. He said he was dismayed that legislative
time was being wasted on these bill hearings and asked the
committee to work on something that mattered instead of "culture
wars."
7:44:33 PM
ADAM HAYS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105.
He stated that he was bewildered as to why the bill was being
prioritized and questioned the problem the bill sought to solve.
If the governor really cared about the mental and physical
health of students, he should be doing everything possible to
support comprehensive age-appropriate sex education, he posited.
7:47:01 PM
KATHLEEN RAYMOND, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stressed her opposition to the governor's sponsor
statement and urged the committee not to move the bill.
7:48:50 PM
KRISTINA VAN HOOGMOED, Representing Self, testified in
opposition to HB 105. She opined that the bill was not right,"
and that it would create a lot more work for teachers.
7:49:40 PM
DR. ROBIN HOLMES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stated that she stood in personal and professional
opposition to HB 105. She said in many cases, an educator may
be the only trusted adult that kids have, adding that HB 105
would put children in jeopardy by forcing educators to disclose
information that may cause (indisc.). She pointed out that
parents already have the right to withhold education from their
children if they choose. She urged the committee to protect the
safety and dignity of Alaska's youth by opposing HB 105.
7:51:51 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 7:51 p.m. to 8:14 p.m.
8:14:25 PM
JESSICA ROZATO, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that the bill was an overreach, cruel in scope
and practice, and brought out the worst in humanity by bullying
and erasing the young and most vulnerable of Alaska's
communities. If the committee really wanted to protect
children, she suggested background checks for those working
around children; additionally, to focus on developing and
funding higher education programs for teachers.
8:16:14 PM
NICHOLE BEARDEN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She expressed her disappointment that Alaska had joined
many other states in attempting to pass anti-trans legislation.
She said she did not stand behind staff members in school having
to choose between "outing" a student or facing legal
consequences. She said that school is sometimes the safest
place for children to explore their gender identity and
sexuality, and that children should not be stripped of their
freedom.
8:18:14 PM
TODD WEHNES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105, stating that it was a bill against communities' most
vulnerable children.
8:19:09 PM
ELSTUN LAUESEN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He said the bill title falsely implied that parents did
not have rights and asserted that parents already have all the
rights that they need to be involved in their kids' education.
He opined that the bill would create conflict by targeting the
most vulnerable population of students. He defined HB 105 as
disingenuous.
8:21:28 PM
KAIA BLOUNT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She offered her belief that the bill went directly against
Bree's Law, which made efforts to educate and support children
against dating violence. HB 105 would undermine Brees Law by
making teachers "jump through hoops" to teach basic lessons, she
opined.
8:23:54 PM
DOMINIC SCALISE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He stated that there were clearly no studies
demonstrating harm to students receiving sex education or
acknowledging gender identity. Legislating communication
between parents and children is something that can only result
in harm for those children in abusive homes, he said.
8:25:30 PM
BETH SHORT-RHOADS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stated that she wished to address the sex education
portion of the bill. Sex education teaches children how to be
safe, not only from unwanted pregnancy but from abusive
relationships, she said. Furthermore, sex education gives teens
the tools to say no to sex.
8:27:42 PM
JESSICA GUANA, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She offered her belief that parental rights in a child's
education should never supersede a child's right to education.
She explained that her parents had opted her out from receiving
certain sex education even though she wanted to receive it. She
said she felt the deficit of the course, which affected her in
the long-term.
8:29:22 PM
ROBERT PATTERSON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He urged the committee not to pass HB 105.
8:30:22 PM
GUS PAUL, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105.
He reaffirmed that being LGBTQIA was not a choice. He said the
bill would hinder economic success in Alaska and drive people
away from the state who are looking to start families. He
believed the bill would be a step backwards.
8:31:44 PM
DAVID LESLIE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He said he was worried that the bill would not only make
it more difficult for LGBTQIA teachers who are already facing
difficulties, but also straight and (indisc.) gender parents
with LGBTQIA children that would move out of state, further
exasperating school staffing problems. Additionally, he
believed that the bill could create hardships for indigenous
students who use their traditional and often multiple names.
8:34:12 PM
RAE RAMOS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105,
and uses "they/them" pronouns. They began by explaining "gender
dysphoria" and opined that the idea that trans kids are causing
problems is fear mongering from people who don't understand.
They pointed out that not all homes are safe homes, and that
school is sometimes the safest place.
8:36:35 PM
EMILY COHEN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that she worked for a mental health provider at
a community center for children and adults. She said there was
great risk for suicide and mental health issues because of the
discrimination LGBTQIA receive. She urged the committee not to
move the bill forward and instead, focus on preventing the high
rates of child abuse and suicide in the state.
8:37:58 PM
JOHN LETTOW, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
He stated that HB 105 further defined parental authority beyond
the 1978 congressional protection that gives parents a right to
inspect the curriculum being taught to their children. He added
that HB 105 had been mischaracterized as discriminating against
confused or alternative gender students. He believed that the
bill would protect privacy and safety for all students.
8:40:24 PM
KELLY NASH, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She argued that 99 percent of kids had been forgetting about by
testifiers, indicating that only trans kids were being
addressed. She said parents just wanted to know what was being
taught in school. She believed that everyone who opposed the
bill had a bad agenda. She claimed that a young child who had
testified earlier was likely "groomed," characterizing it as
disgusting. She reiterated her support for HB 105.
8:41:30 PM
MARY SZATKOWSKI, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said the actions proposed in HB 105 violate the
privacy of LGBTQIA students (indisc.), their physical safety,
and their mental health. She stated that she wished for
students to be safe, respected, and happy, asserting that the
bill would not support that.
8:42:39 PM
DAVID BOYLE, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
He said he strongly supported parental rights. He shared his
belief that educators only want parents involved in certain
areas, adding that sex education was not one of them. He noted
some testifiers believed that parents could not be trusted with
their kids; however, if school staff suspects abuse, they are
mandatory reporters by law. He acknowledged that kids don't
always bring home notes for parents for various reasons,
indicating that it would be no different for notification of sex
education. It is vital that parents have the right to opt their
child into sex education, he said.
8:45:04 PM
PAMELA HALL, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She expressed concern that only a small percentage of the
population felt safe at school. She asked what about the girls,
who outnumber the trans kids, who do not feel safe in restrooms
or locker rooms. She added that she did not understand why
people are so opposed to gender neutral bathrooms and locker
rooms, emphasizing that girls cannot be stripped of their rights
either. She said she had heard young adults stating they were
bullied because they were trans; however, she asked about the
other kids being bullied. She stated that she, her kids, and
grandkids were all bullied, arguing that those who are not are
the exception, or might be the bully.
8:47:20 PM
ALEX PETKANAS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. After hearing testimony, he observed that the bill was
"wildly unpopular. Additionally, he believed the bill was
dangerous because it would limit access to essential sex
education information. He also noted the higher rates of
suicides in trans individuals, and implored the committee to let
the bill die, instead of letting children die.
8:48:42 PM
JO ANN GRUBER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She was of the understanding that the bill was written
with the guise of safeguarding parental rights in a child's
education. Instead, she said it appeared to be an attempt to
weaken the state's public education system. If the bill passed,
she opined that it would cost Alaska far more than what was
listed in the fiscal note.
8:50:25 PM
SAGE WHITMAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He said he was a trans boy who was in school, and stated
that he loved Alaska; however, bills like this made it harder
for him to be successful and want to stay in the state.
8:52:26 PM
JAY HITCHCOCK, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He shard that he was a father of a trans child. He found
the bill to be authoritarian and believed it was intended to
turn citizens against citizens. If the bill passed, other
rights would be stripped away next, he said.
8:54:26 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 8:54 p.m.
8:55:53 PM
DR. VALERIE BROOKS, Representing Self, testified in opposition
to HB 105. She shared that she had several decades of
experience as a public school educator, and that several
students had come out to her as gender diverse. She said she
honored their determination to live authentic lives. She opined
that the bill violated children's rights and urged the committee
to stand against HB 105 and the discrimination it embodied.
8:58:10 PM
EMILY HARTLEY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105, specifically on gender identity, she said. She stated that
she was interested in the safety of trans people all around
Alaska, adding that she was terrified of what HB 105 would do to
the LGBTQIA+ youth in school.
9:00:02 PM
ERIN HOLLINGSWORTH, Representing Self, testified in opposition
to HB 105. She stated that she has 20 years of experience
working with children and teens and that most organizations
invite family involvement. She emphasized that children are not
property and must be trusted to find their way and find the
mentors they need if they aren't available at home. She opined
that the bill would not do anything to lift people up together.
9:02:25 PM
ELENA PRISSEKIN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said she concurred with testimony that preceded
hers, adding that had she not received education on bodily
autonomy when she was in the first grade, she would not have
recognized a sexual predator in her community. The bill could
also hurt Alaska fiscally with potential and frivolous lawsuits,
she said.
9:03:36 PM
ANALISE GOEDEKE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She said not all young people have a safety net and
offered her belief that the bill targeted and endangered LGBTQIA
youths.
9:04:50 PM
JULIE SCHMIDT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said that she and her partner were retired teachers,
and offered her belief that sex education should start at a
young age and advance appropriately. She said as a teacher, she
was a listener, supporter, counselor, and advocate, and opined
that the bill would be harmful to students.
9:06:56 PM
MICHAEL FLINT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He stated that he joined the military under the "Don't
Ask, Don't Tell" policy, but before then, he did not have the
support to help him navigate his path until he found what he
needed in school, where he turned to a trusted adult. He opined
that the bill was not about parental rights but about silencing
queer and trans children, and "outing" them to a parent causing
them further dehumanization.
9:08:53 PM
TAMARA KRUSE ROSELIUS, Representing Self, testified in
opposition to HB 105. She offered her belief that requiring
"opt-in" for sex education would overlook educating many
students who need the information and don't have involved
parents. She added that forcing teachers to "out" trans and
non-gender conforming youths to their parents would harm
students who are already at higher risk for self-harm.
9:11:17 PM
STACEY LANGE, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She expressed deep concern about the promotion of gender
ideology that permeates public schools across the nation. She
referred to a study in 2017 that found gender ideology to harm
children, and urged educators and legislators to reject all
policies that would condition children to accept a life of
chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex as
normal. The fact youths are given puberty blocking drugs, she
said, could ensure that they choose a lifetime of carcinogenic
and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones that could affect their
mental and physical health.
9:13:43 PM
LAUREN BESKOW, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He expressed his belief that teachers need to teach, and
parenting skills need to be left with the parents. He said the
majority of parents know whats best [for their kids], adding
that children are not slaves to their parents.
9:15:24 PM
YVONNE UMNER, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She opined that the bill would not do anything other than demand
that parents be allowed to know what their children's curriculum
is. She added that it would allow teachers to withhold
information if they thought the child's safety was in danger.
She reported that transgender identity could lead to suicide and
believed that parents and families were moving to states where
parent's rights were upheld.
9:18:06 PM
TITUS SOFRON, Representing Self, testified during the hearing on
HB 105. She offered religious references and spoke on the
subject of child molestation [indisc].
9:20:24 PM
KELLI REED, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105
and shared that they preferred they/them pronouns. They said
that since age five, they knew that they were not their
biological sex and could speak volumes of what could happen to
trans kids in families that are unsupportive. They opined that
introducing a bill like this could overburden a school system
that was already behind. They opined that the the bill was
intended to align Alaska with a far-right ideology that had been
indoctrinated.
9:23:03 PM
ALICIA SIDEBOTTOM, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She offered her belief that HB 105 was discriminator,
targeted LGBTQIA youths, and puts children in danger;
furthermore, it would make teachers' jobs more difficult. She
added that the bill would require an unrealistic amount of
permission slips that would be burdensome for all.
9:24:55 PM
CARLY JENSEN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She expressed her belief that the bill directly violated
Article 1, Section 1, Section 22, and Section 3 of the Alaska
Constitution. She gave an example of a Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violation involving a
doctor who told parents about aa childs sexual history,
stressing that the doctor would be in direct violation of
federal law. She shared her understanding that school
counselors were also considered medical professionals. She
added that she did not agree with the wording in the bill,
adding that schools would be burdened by the proposed
legislation.
9:27:20 PM
JOHN OSTERHOUT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He stated that being he was a supervisor at an emergency
shelter, he had seen firsthand runaway and homeless youth, and
he knows school for many kids is sometimes the only safe place
that they have to go. If kids lose the safety net of school, he
said, they could be put in direct harm.
9:30:02 PM
VALINA HANSEN, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She opined that HB 105 promoted appropriate parental
authority and safety for all in public schools.
9:31:02 PM
DIANNE MACRAE, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She expressed her concern with hearing that teachers have
more say, which she found scary. She said family is very
important and the fact must be addressed that parents need to
know what is going on.
9:33:22 PM
PRISCILLA HURLEY, Representing Self, testified during the
hearing on HB 105. She stated that she wished to make one major
point about responsibility. She believed that parents, not the
state school system, were responsible for the burden and joy of
their children,
9:35:55 PM
KASSANDRA SMILEY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She opined that the government should not dictate what
people can (indisc.). She believed that Alaska used to be a
place of personal liberty, and that the bill was one of
government overreach.
9:36:53 PM
LIZ LYKE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105.
She stated that kids can come out as trans to accepting peers
and asked "not to make life hell" for kids by passing HB 105.
9:37:40 PM
MAREN MILLER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She believed that the reason for public testimony was to
talk about the real-world effects of the bill. As for sex
education, she pointed out parents already have the right to
opt out. She asserted that putting the burden on teachers and
parents to opt in would be burdensome and harder for children
to get the education they need. She added that the bill would
"out" trans youths to their parents, opining that the only bills
that should pass should support the most vulnerable populations.
9:40:00 PM
SARAH SULLIVAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She offered a personal example of her experiences in
Fairbanks, Alaska, where a friend who was being abused by her
father found a teacher that she could confide in. She stated
that she would be disgusted if that opportunity was taken away
from children. She opined that the bill target a group of
children who face more discrimination and asked the committee to
"get rid of this bill."
9:41:40 PM
SIQIINQ MAUPIN, Director, Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Artic,
Testified in opposition to HB 105. She stated that she grew up
in an unsafe home, and if HB 105 had been enacted at the time,
she may not be here today. Should the bill pass, she believed
that it could increase sexual assault against children. She
said HB 105 should be treated as gender-based discrimination.
9:43:33 PM
RANDI IVERSON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared her shock that the bill was even being
considered. She added that when she came to Alaska, she thought
it was a place where one could express total freedom. She
opined that the bill was discriminatory against all Alaskan
citizens and urged the committee to stop the bill.
9:46:06 PM
SHANE BRODIE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. They identified with the LGTBQIA community, sharing that
their parents and other relatives were former teachers in the
Northwest Arctic Borough. The bill would oppress a minority
community and bully fellow Alaskans, they said, opining that
ever freedom-loving Alaskan should oppose HB 105.
9:47:29 PM
SHARON HEIN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She expressed her concerns that the bill would remove
safety in the school environment for all children. She added
that the bill was bad for children, parents, and for the
educational system.
9:48:24 PM
SAMANTHA THOMAS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stressed her opposition to the vague language in
the bill and believed that the legislation could be used to
manipulate people. If passed, she asked how one could legislate
such a law, which she characterized as an unnecessary burden and
anti-Alaskan.
9:49:36 PM
AARON SPRATT, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
He offered his understanding that the bill upheld and promoted
parental rights. He said he trusted that the committee would do
whats right and objectively good, and shared his support for
Section 6 of the bill.
9:52:03 PM
DENILE AULT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She offered a personal anecdote of a time in school when
she could not start in a program because her father and mother
didn't approve of it. The bill would traumatize non-conforming
gender students, she opined.
9:54:49 PM
MARK AAMODT, Representing Self, testified during the hearing on
HB 105. He believed that there were good points on both sides.
9:57:12 PM
BRITTANY TOMKINS, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She offered her belief that more transparency was needed
in the school systems between faculty, the school board, and
parents. She supported kids being protected in reference to
bathrooms and locker rooms, and that parents should be able to
see the sex education curriculum.
9:58:30 PM
AMY RODMAN, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She stated that she supported open communication between schools
and parents regarding a child's well-being. She argued that
children under 18 were not fully developed emotionally or
physically and needed guidance. Additionally, she acknowledged
that some children come from dysfunctional families. She agreed
that locker rooms and bathrooms needed to be separated by
biological sex, adding that it would be unfair for a safe space
to be provided to one child but not another.
10:00:45 PM
LISA BRICKER, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She offered her belief that the bill would force trans
students into silence, and she stated that teachers did not get
into education to "speak their way into a lawsuit" by calling a
child by another name. She added that overstressed and
overworked parents would have extra pressure regarding the
return of all permission slips.
10:02:13 PM
DANIEL TWEEDY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105, and stated that the legislature should oppose it too.
10:02:39 PM
CHANDRA COFFROY, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She said the relationship between parents, teachers, and
students needed to be strengthened and the bill would help
accomplish that. She referenced funding for public schools and
said it would be detrimental to have students leave the public
school system.
10:04:22 PM
CLAUDIA HAINES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. Specifically, she said, HB 105 would put all kids and
teens at higher risk for sexual assault and trafficking.
Without access to comprehensive sex education, young people lack
critical information to keep themselves and their communities
safe. She opined that the bill would create barriers to
families and would not improve parental rights, as parents
already have the option to opt their children out at any time.
10:06:38 PM
JACLYN GAGNON, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She stated that she was calling as a mother who cared
about knowing what her children are taught in school. She
believed that the responsibility relied solely on the parents
even if there are supportive teachers and counselors. She added
that she thought permission slips were a vital part of school
activities, and school should be a safe space for all students,
especially in the locker rooms and bathrooms.
10:08:31 PM
GEORGE SNODGRASS, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He offered his belief that the bill protected the rights
of parents and their children in school. From listening to the
testimony tonight, he gathered that people think that parents
are against the teachers; however, he argued that teachers and
parents should work as partners in educating children. He
opined that it is not what is being taught, but how it is being
taught, and that the lack of transparency would be improved by
the passage of HB 105.
10:10:55 PM
DANA THYNES, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She asked how it was possible for parents to trust their local
schools when administrators, teachers, and staff treat them like
the enemy. Each year, she said, more parents in Alaska decide
not to put their kids in public schools because of fear of an
agenda to sexualize children at younger ages. She hoped the
passage of HB 105 would return some autonomy to parents and
stated that everyone should have a voice.
10:12:48 PM
GAIL MCBRIDE, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She said she had heard mischaracterization and much deviating
from what the bill actually addressed. Families are the
foundation of society, she said, and parents care more than
anyone about their children. She believed that nothing could be
worse than teachers conspiring with children to deceive the
parents. She stressed her support for everything in the bill.
10:15:07 PM
CHAVA SCHAPIRA, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105, indicating that there was nothing in the bill that
protected children, parents, or anyone. She opined that queer
and trans people have always existed and will continue to exist
and that they should not be stopped from trying to get an
education. Further, she believed that the bill would encourage
people to leave Alaska.
10:17:21 PM
AMANDA SPRATT, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She expresses her opinion that sex education was not
merely teaching children about their changing bodies,
reproduction, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The new
programs, she believed, promote an ideology at odds with purity,
decency, and even proof. She opined that a focus on students'
sexuality has no place in education, adding that sexual
preferences should remain private, and not be discussed or
celebrated in school settings where parents send their children
to school to be academically educated.
10:19:49 PM
WILL MULDOON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He referred to previous testifiers who brought up the
dismantling of Bree's Law, which was his primary concern with
the bill.
10:20:55 PM
ASA PENDERGRAST, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He gave personal examples of children who were excluded
by their parents when they found out their children were gay or
trans, emphasizing his opposition to HB 105.
10:23:00 PM
KEVIN BERRY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He paraphrased a passage from the catechism that LGTBQIA
people should be accepted with respect, compassion and
sensitivity. He opined that HB 105 was clearly discriminatory,
adding that schools needed resources and money, not
controversial laws that invite lawsuits.
10:23:56 PM
JAMES SQUYRES, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He stated that he had been watching public testimony,
claiming that Planned Parenthood and others were trying to
"stack the deck" with testimony in opposition to the bill on
Twitter. He said he did not agree with Planned Parenthood.
10:24:25 PM
MARGIE THOMSON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she had been a gender therapist for the past 10
years and had worked with over 300 individuals and families
throughout the state. She believed that even the introduction
in the bill could cause fear that may result in the suicide of a
student who feels unsafe at home or at school. She asked the
legislature to respect students and their gender identity and
the privacy to come out at their own timing.
10:25:48 PM
BILL SPENCER, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
He referred to a previous testifier who stated that there should
be background checks for school employees for student safety.
The bill, he opined, would bring common sense back to the
classroom and was a well worded bill. He added that not all
parents are going to be involved in their children's education,
but the ones who are, have the right to know what is going on in
the classroom.
10:28:02 PM
IVAN HODES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. As a former educator, he stated that he agreed with
previous testifiers who spoke in opposition to HB 105. He
opined that the bill was a mechanism for suppressing the rights
of sexual and gender minorities in this country.
10:30:02 PM
KACYA BATISHCHEVA, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She offered her belief that the bill would harm queer
youth in Alaska. She explained that as a queer youth in her
home country, there were no adults to go to for support. She
said she did not want anyone to experience such alienation.
10:32:25 PM
GUY HARRIS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He gave a personal example of his childhood and expressed
his deep opposition to HB 105.
10:34:18 PM
KATE JOHNSON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that the bill did not represent the values and
views of Alaska. She said she had a particular concern with the
erosion of the sex education at public schools. She stated that
children should not be made to be more vulnerable than they
already are.
10:35:28 PM
JULEE-ANNA PREUIT, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She focused on youth sex education and said she was
worried that teachers would no longer be viewed as trusted
adults if they have to out someone. She added that she would
not want to be sued if she could not be that trusted adult.
10:37:04 PM
EPHRAIM FROEHLICH, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He opined that the bill was a harmful policy directed
at the state's most at-risk youths and brought shame upon all of
Alaska. The bill would perpetuate harm on a new generation and
withhold proper education, he said.
10:39:01 PM
KATHY MILLER, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She offered her belief that "opting in" was a better choice for
parents and believed that people were trying to divide the
family by not allowing parents to opt in to certain things.
She gave an example of her child coming home to tell her that
the class learned something that she was completely opposed to.
She shared her belief that some classes should not be "blanket
classes," and that schools should be in the business of teaching
children.
10:41:20 PM
LISA MALONEY, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She pointed out that not all childhood homes are safe, and
that schools are a critically important safety net for at-risk
children. She opined that the bill would reduce that safety net
by making it harder for all children to receive age-appropriate
information on how their bodies work and how to keep themselves
healthy and safe.
10:43:47 PM
JOHN CREED, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He opined that the bill is anti LGBTQIA legislation.
10:45:29 PM
MAE MARSH, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She gave her background as a former Title IX officer and
administrator and explained that she encountered educators who
believed they had a right to counsel students regarding abuse
and keep the discussions confidential, which was not allowed
under federal law. Although this was for college students, and
HB 105 addressed grades K-12, parents are ultimately responsible
for their children and have a right to know what is going on,
she said. She asserted that Title IX and anti-discrimination
laws were in place in educational institutions and that parents
should not be blocked.
10:47:56 PM
SKYLAR EVANS, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He opined that the bill was an additional pressure that
would hurt Alaska's schools and educators in preparing youth for
the reality of life; further, he believed the bill would make
teachers dehumanize the youth of Alaska. He offered personal
examples of being a source of strength for different students
dealing with abusive relationships. He added that sex education
was not a tawdry thing.
10:50:24 PM
OLIVER BERGH, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. He offered examples of different religious practices,
opining that the proposed legislation should not be enacted.
10:52:12 PM
IRENE QUEDNOW, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She believed that parents have a right to know what is
being taught to their children. She defined groomer as
someone who isolates children from their family and friends, as
well as keeping secrets with minors. She clarified that she did
not think teachers are groomers; however, she characterized
teachers who keep secrets from parents as a "warning light.
10:54:33 PM
EARL WILLIANS JR., Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. He stated that he opposed the bill and asked the
legislature not to vote for it.
10:54:57 PM
SONAZ SAFARI, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that Alaska was committed to personal freedoms
and rights and found it concerning that such a bill was being
considered. She stressed healthy sex education, which could
prevent a variety of problems students may experience.
10:57:00 PM
HANNAH WARREN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated her concern that if the bill passed, LGTBQIA
youth would be opened up to bullying and could have their safe
space taken away. Opting in for sex education, she said,
could cause unnecessary barriers and could lead to STDs and
pregnancy [without experiencing a healthy sex education].
10:58:32 PM
REBECCA AMES, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she would speak specifically to the section that
required written permission from a parent to use a different
name or pronoun for a child at a school. She believed that the
provision could put many trans, non-binary, and non-gender
conforming children in danger at home, and that school should be
a safe place for an already vulnerable population.
10:59:33 PM
ALEX BARSEKIAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She said she worked in reproductive healthcare, adding
that comprehensive sex education in schools was a must" to help
teens make informed decisions throughout their lives. She
stressed that school should be a safe place for all students.
11:00:40 PM
EMILY SULLIVAN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that the bill, which was being touted as a
parental rights bill, targeted trans and queer rights and would
make school an even less safe place for them.
11:02:29 PM
EMILY GEBEL, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She offered her belief that HB 105 quantified principles that
had always been part of natural law. She added that she found
the testimony expressing the notion that parents are not the
best guardians for their children to be appalling. She believed
that keeping secrets encouraged grooming and that successful
kids had involved parents. She expressed concern about girls
having a safe space in school. If the bill did not pass, she
opined that a trend of Alaska leading the nation in sexual abuse
would be supported.
11:04:34 PM
ERICA WATSON, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She stated that as an educator, targeting vulnerable young
people was a bad idea and wanted to add her voice in solidarity
to the other testifiers.
11:06:04 PM
SCOTT HANSEN, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
He expressed his belief that children were born to families, not
to the state, and that parents held moral and legal
responsibility for their children. He opined that the bill
would strengthen the authority of parents to make responsible
decisions for their children.
11:07:24 PM
JAN DELAND, Representing Self, testified in support of HB 105.
She opined that the bill would implement common sense guidelines
to protect children. She stated that she is very involved with
her four children's education, noting that she also grew up in
the public school system in Anchorage. She relayed stories of
"inappropriate" behavior by teachers toward students and
stressed that parents have responsibility towards their
children.
11:09:49 PM
KRISTEN SCHUPP, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She opined that the bill was punitive to students,
educators, and school districts, and that children are
independent humans who deserve respect. She argued that if a
child feels more comfortable being themselves at school, its
the fault of the parent, adding that educators should not be
penalized for that. She opined that the bill was legislative
overreach.
11:11:43 PM
EMMANUEL HANSEN, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He offered personal stories of he and his siblings'
negative experiences and agreed with prior testifier's thoughts
on grooming. He stressed his support for the bill and parental
rights, adding that he questioned the sanity of the school
system and what they push for.
11:13:56 PM
MICHALE RATZLAFF, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She stressed the importance of parents, and urged the
committee to recognize that children are people, not
possessions, with the right to self-expression. She opposed
requiring teachers to tell parents things that might put their
children at risk.
11:15:54 PM
SUMMER ANDERSEN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to
HB 105. She opined that the bill was vaguely written, deeply
homophobic, and opened schools up to controversy and lawsuits.
She said the bill was unnecessary and should not take up so much
time.
11:17:04 PM
LOIS EPSTEIN, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB
105. She shared her belief that there had been no evidence of
the need for the changes contained in the bill. She opined that
the adverse consequences for some children could potentially
lead to suicides. She shared her understanding that the bill
may also contain constitutional problems related to privacy.
She stressed her disappointment with the governor and
legislators who support the bill and urged the legislature to
reconsider.
11:18:43 PM
MEG WAITE, Representing Self, testified in opposition to HB 105.
She stated that she believed in the separation of church and
state and protecting First Amendment rights of all citizens, not
just a select few. Public education, she said, is a place to
learn new ideas and set goals. She expressed concern that the
bill would create barriers for students experiencing abuse, and
noted her concern with Section 6 of the bill.
11:21:18 PM
IRIS WILLIAMS, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. She stated that she agreed with the language in the bill.
She asserted that parents, as guardians of their children, have
the right to decide what is best for their children. She added
that there should be transparency in public schools and opined
that parents have the right to know what their kids are being
taught. She added that parents should not have to worry about
an educational system being deceptive about their own children.
11:23:29 PM
JASON ROBINSON, Representing Self, testified in support of HB
105. He expressed his confusion as to how the bill targets the
LGTBQIA community and said the bill would increase the rights of
active, responsible parents. He stressed his agreement with the
language and intent of the bill. He acknowledged that some
youths have had bad experiences at home; however, he was
concerned that those experiences could limit the rights of
active and loving parents.
11:25:49 PM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD reminded the public that testimony could be
emailed to the committee. She sought final comment from
committee members.
11:26:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT thanked everyone who testified. She
stressed the importance of parents knowing what was going on in
school, and for all to feel welcome in school.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK stated that he was impressed by the
eloquence of the young people who took the time to testify.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY thanked everyone who called in and stated
that it was important for people to express their feelings. She
added that parents should be aware that they can always review
curriculum and opt out.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX expressed appreciation for all the heartfelt
testimony on HB 105. He encouraged parents to get involved in
the conversation and to check out the curriculum.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE stated how positive it was to hear all the
feelings and thoughts of Alaskans.
11:31:38 PM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD wished to let parents and educators know that
the legislature supports them. She encouraged them to keep
"sounding off," and to keep teaching. She noted that public
testimony would remain open and announced that HB 105 would be
held over.
11:32:19 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Education Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 11:32 p.m.